Supreme Garage Door Repair seeks Chief Marketing Officer (Carrollton, TX)

🔥 RESEARCH & INSIGHT 🔥 :

Supreme Garage Door LLC operates as part of The SGD Group, a holding company founded by Ron Dahari that runs multiple garage door brands across Texas and Minnesota. The company started in 2018 and has grown from roughly $450,000 in early revenue to $12 million today. The SGD Group operates 11+ branch locations and employs over 100 people across its brands, which include Supreme Garage Door (Texas), Superior Garage Door (Minnesota), and SGD Springs (its manufacturing arm).

The job posting seeks a CMO to scale the company from $12M to $100M revenue. The compensation range is $100K-$200K salary to manage a $3 million marketing budget and a team of 6 people plus contractors. The posting emphasizes that every dollar must be measurable and tied to profitable growth.

Key implications: The incoming CMO would be managing a marketing budget that's 25% of total revenue—more than double what even aggressive growth companies typically spend. This role requires executing this with a salary that's 40-60% below market rate for CMOs at companies this size, while being expected to achieve 733% revenue growth while fixing reputation problems and expanding into new states.

✅ subscribe

---

Critical Context and Risk Factors

Supreme has a pending Fair Labor Standards Act lawsuit filed in August 2024 (Shat v. Supreme Garage Door LLC, Case No. 3:24-cv-02202). This is a collective action naming both the company and Ron Dahari personally, typically indicating wage and overtime violations. For a company scaling aggressively, this suggests systemic challenges with technician compensation—the exact people required to deliver on the brand promises the CMO's marketing will make.

The company also has a reputation challenge that marketing didn't create and probably can't fix alone. Supreme has 600+ five-star Google reviews but only 2.7 stars on Yelp (16 reviews). Common complaints center on "ripoff pricing" and aggressive upselling. Customer testimonials indicate instances where Supreme charged $2,000 across multiple visits without resolving the problem, while a competitor reportedly fixed it for under $200. This isn't a messaging problem—it's a product and sales methodology issue that will amplify with increased marketing investment.

The $3M marketing budget represents an unusual situation. At 25% of revenue, this is roughly 2-3x what comparable home services companies spend even in aggressive growth mode. This suggests either extraordinary confidence in ROI or unsustainable burn rates. Industry standard for growth-phase home services is 15-20% of revenue maximum. The job posting doesn't clarify whether this $3M includes team salaries (6 people + CMO = $500K-800K fully loaded), which would mean actual media spend is only $2.2-2.5M.

🟥 GET UNSTUCK: Book an hour with CMO recruiter, Harry Joiner, who prepared this analysis. Includes a 3-month membership to NEXTgig™

---

STRENGTHS

1. Proven ability to grow fast in a tough market (Top Priority)

Supreme grew 2,567% in roughly six years, going from $450K to $12M. That's an 81% compound annual growth rate in the fragmented, competitive garage door repair market. This isn't luck—it proves Ron Dahari knows how to scale operations and that the business model works at current scale. The company didn't just add revenue; it built infrastructure with 11 locations and 100+ employees.

What this means for CMO: The founder has already demonstrated he can execute on growth. The CMO's role isn't to convince him that growth is possible—it's to help him execute smarter and faster. This is better than joining a company where the CMO must prove the concept works.

2. Vertical integration creates competitive advantages

Through SGD Springs (founded April 2020), the company manufactures its own garage door springs. This is unusual for a regional operator and provides margin protection against supply chain disruptions. Most competitors buy from distributors at marked-up prices. Supreme can potentially undercut on price while maintaining margins, or keep prices high and capture the manufacturing margin as well.

The contradiction: This manufacturing capability represents a B2B opportunity (selling springs to other garage door companies) that appears underdeveloped. If the CMO focuses only on residential consumer marketing, significant revenue opportunity may be missed. However, developing a B2B marketing strategy while also scaling residential requires executing two very different go-to-market strategies simultaneously.

3. Multi-state platform provides expansion template

The company operates in two distinct markets (Texas and Minnesota) with different weather patterns, competition, and customer demographics. If the company has figured out how to make both work, it possesses a playbook that could theoretically work in other states. The 11 locations suggest the company has solved some multi-location operational challenges that kill other home services businesses.

4. Massive marketing budget compared to competitors

The $3M marketing budget gives the CMO actual firepower that most marketing leaders don't get. Competitors like Action Garage Door (41 years in Dallas market) reportedly spend $180K annually on TV/radio. Precision Garage Door spends roughly $240K. If Supreme allocates $150K-250K to traditional media, the company will have outsized share of voice compared to its actual market share. This can accelerate brand building significantly.

The tension: This budget advantage only matters if it's deployed effectively. Burning $3M poorly is worse than spending $1M well. The "every dollar must be measurable" requirement combined with brand-building expectations creates tension—brand advertising has 18-36 month lag effects that don't show up in 90-day ROI dashboards.

✅ subscribe

---

WEAKNESSES

1. Compensation package suggests misalignment with market standards (Top Priority)

The posting lists $100K-$200K salary for a CMO role requiring experience scaling companies from tens of millions to $100M+. Comparable CMO positions average $326,000 total compensation. Fractional CMOs for home services command $252,930+. This isn't slightly below market—it's 40-60% below market.

This creates adverse selection: CMOs capable of 8x scaling won't apply at this compensation. The candidate pool will likely include people who either don't have the stated experience, can't command market rates for specific reasons, or are gambling on equity that isn't mentioned in the posting.

What this really means: Either (a) the company doesn't understand what it costs to hire this caliber of talent, (b) there's an assumption that equity compensation will make up the difference but isn't explicitly stated, or (c) this is actually a marketing director role with "CMO" in the job title. None of these scenarios inspire confidence.

2. Reputation challenges will compound with scale

The Yelp-Google rating gap isn't just a cosmetic problem. It indicates Supreme attracts customers through digital marketing (hence the Google reviews) but struggles with value perception once customers interact with sales and pricing. The specific complaint pattern—"felt like a ripoff even after negotiation," "pressure to upsell"—suggests aggressive sales tactics that marketing alone cannot resolve.

Scaling marketing before fixing this will generate more negative reviews at scale. A 2.7-star Yelp rating is manageable for a $12M regional company. At $100M national scale, it becomes a brand-destroying liability that undermines everything the CMO builds.

The uncomfortable truth: The company cannot market its way out of an operations problem. The sales methodology and pricing structure need fixing before aggressive marketing scale-up. However, the job posting emphasizes growth, not fixing fundamentals, which means the CMO might bear responsibility for problems they didn't create and can't fully control.

3. Active lawsuit creates multiple risks

The pending FLSA collective action isn't just a legal problem—it's a marketing challenge. As the company scales nationally and generates more press, "Supreme Garage Door lawsuit" will appear in Google searches. This affects:

• Recruiting (difficult to hire technicians when wage lawsuits are public)
• Google Guaranteed badge eligibility (may not pass background checks)
• Brand positioning (inability to authentically claim "we treat our people right")
• Expansion timing (challenging to enter new markets with unresolved legal matters)

This information exists in public federal court dockets and cannot be addressed through traditional reputation management.

4. Thin management infrastructure for 8x scaling

The company has 100+ employees total but the marketing team is 6 people plus contractors. To go from $12M to $100M requires:

• Hiring 400-600 additional technicians
• Opening 30-40+ new locations
• Entering 10-15 new state markets
• Building market-specific campaigns for each location
• Managing brand consistency across a national footprint

A team of 6 can't execute this. The CMO would need to build an organization within the organization, which means hiring managers, specialists, and coordinators—all while delivering results that justify the hiring. Most CMOs underestimate how much time they'll spend recruiting and managing up rather than executing marketing strategy.

5. Founder-centric decision-making may limit autonomy

Ron Dahari personally responds to BBB complaints and is named individually in lawsuits, suggesting highly centralized control. This is normal for founder-led companies at $12M, but can be a challenge when scaling to $100M. The job posting says the CMO will "own the entire marketing department," but in reality, every major decision probably requires founder approval.

This isn't necessarily bad—founders who built successful companies usually have good instincts. But if the candidate is used to having full authority and budget discretion, the reality may create friction. And if the founder's instincts conflict with the CMO's expertise, this creates a no-win situation.

🟥 GET UNSTUCK: Book an hour with CMO recruiter, Harry Joiner, who prepared this analysis. Includes a 3-month membership to NEXTgig™

---

OPPORTUNITIES

1. Fragmented market ready for professional marketing (Top Priority)

The U.S. garage door market is $3.36-4.18 billion with thousands of small operators. Most competitors are family-owned businesses that don't do sophisticated marketing. They buy a Yellow Pages ad (or the 2025 equivalent) and rely on word-of-mouth. If the CMO brings disciplined, data-driven marketing to this space, they can take meaningful share.

Action Garage Door has 41 years in Dallas and Overhead Door Company has 104 years, but neither appears to have mastered digital marketing at scale. Precision Garage Door is a franchise, which means local franchisees control marketing budgets and execution varies wildly. Supreme can move faster and more consistently than any of these competitors.

2. Private equity exit pathway at premium multiples

Home services companies achieving $10-15M EBITDA can command 12-15x multiples in today's market. If the CMO successfully scales Supreme to $100M revenue with 15-20% EBITDA margins (industry standard), that's $15-20M EBITDA × 12-15x = $180-300M valuation. Private equity is aggressively buying home services platforms right now. (For context, at current $12M revenue with estimated 15-20% EBITDA margins, Supreme likely generates $1.8-2.4M EBITDA, implying a current valuation of approximately $18-24M at 10x multiples.)

For the candidate personally: If they negotiate equity (which they absolutely should given the below-market salary), a successful exit could be life-changing. But this only matters if (a) they actually get meaningful equity, (b) the company hits the numbers, and (c) they're still there when it sells. The job posting mentions none of this, which is concerning.

3. Technology and smart home integration

The garage door industry is experiencing a tech revolution with smart home integration, AI-enabled systems, and security features. Most homeowners still have "dumb" garage doors, creating upgrade opportunities. Premium smart systems can double the average transaction value from $800-1,500 to $2,000-3,500.

This is a marketing opportunity because the company is not just selling "garage door repair"—it's selling home security, convenience, and modernization. This justifies premium pricing and moves away from commodity competition. But it requires product knowledge and technical credibility that traditional garage door marketing doesn't emphasize.

4. Subscription maintenance model is underpenetrated

Most garage door companies operate on transactional revenue: customer calls with emergency, the company fixes it, relationship ends. Supreme could build recurring revenue through $19.99/month or $199/year maintenance agreements (annual tune-up, priority emergency service, 15% discount on repairs).

Converting even 20-30% of one-time customers to subscribers would create predictable recurring revenue that investors value highly. Customer lifetime value would increase 3-5x. And from a marketing perspective, the company would spend customer acquisition cost once and harvest revenue for years.

The challenge: Building a subscription business requires different operations, different sales training, and different customer service standards. Marketing can create demand, but operations has to deliver. If the company isn't operationally ready for subscriptions, the CMO's marketing will create cancellations and refunds.

5. 48 states with zero Supreme presence

The company operates in Texas and Minnesota, leaving 48 states for expansion. The job posting explicitly mentions wanting to enter more states this year. For a growth-focused CMO, this is greenfield opportunity—the company is not fighting to take share in saturated markets but rather entering markets where it doesn't exist yet.

The risk: Geographic expansion is expensive and slow. Each new market requires:

• $100K-200K in brand-building marketing (12-24 months to establish presence)
• Hiring and training local technicians before revenue starts flowing
• Understanding local competition, regulations, and customer behavior
• Building local SEO presence from zero (takes 6-12 months to rank)

If Supreme tries to enter 10 states simultaneously with a $3M budget, the company will spread resources too thin and fail everywhere instead of succeeding anywhere. The CMO would need to sequence expansion strategically—master 2-3 markets, then replicate—but the posting suggests leadership expects faster growth than that timeline permits.

🟥 GET UNSTUCK: Book an hour with CMO recruiter, Harry Joiner, who prepared this analysis. Includes a 3-month membership to NEXTgig™

---

THREATS

1. Saturation spending without saturation returns (Top Priority)

At 25% of revenue allocated to marketing, Supreme is likely past the point of diminishing returns on some channels. If the company is already #1 in Google Local Services Ads in Dallas, spending more won't generate additional emergency calls—the channel is tapped out. Without marketing mix modeling to identify saturation curves, the company might keep pouring money into maxed-out channels.

A key risk scenario: Leadership pressures the CMO for "more leads," they increase budgets on already-saturated channels, ROI drops, leadership questions their competence, and the CMO is blamed for wasting the budget. Without proper measurement infrastructure to prove which channels are saturated, defending budget allocation decisions becomes difficult.

2. Private equity competitors with deeper pockets

Well-capitalized PE firms like Leonard Green & Partners (Wrench Group) and Odyssey Investment Partners (Service Champions) are aggressively rolling up home services companies. They can:

• Outbid Supreme for attractive acquisition targets
• Outspend Supreme in local markets to gain share
• Offer better compensation to recruit Supreme's technicians
• Leverage multi-brand platforms for cross-selling

Supreme's bootstrapped model puts the company at a capital disadvantage. The $3M marketing budget sounds substantial until the company is competing against PE-backed platforms with $50M+ marketing budgets across multiple brands. In markets where they decide to compete aggressively, Supreme will get priced out of top ad positions.

3. Labor shortage + lawsuit = margin squeeze during critical growth phase

The home services industry faces skilled trades shortages nationwide. Supreme needs to simultaneously:

• Fix compensation structures to resolve the FLSA lawsuit
• Increase wages to attract technicians in a tight labor market
• Scale technician headcount 5-8x to support revenue growth

This creates a margin squeeze precisely as profitability becomes critical for exit valuations. As marketing leader, the CMO will be caught between "generate more leads" pressure and "we can't service more customers because we're short on techs" reality.

A significant operational risk: The CMO successfully generates massive lead volume, but the company can't convert or service them due to labor shortages. Customers become angry about wait times or poor service. Negative reviews spike. The CMO is blamed for "wrong kind of leads" when the real problem is operational capacity.

4. Founder exit timing risk

If Ron Dahari is building toward a personal liquidity event in the next 3-5 years, he may:

• Prioritize short-term revenue growth over sustainable profitability
• Make decisions optimizing for sale metrics rather than long-term brand value
• Exit post-transaction, leaving the CMO in a PE-backed environment with different expectations
• Cut budgets dramatically if the business doesn't sell on his timeline

The CMO needs to understand his actual intentions before accepting this role. Is he building a company to run for 20 years, or building it to sell in 3-5 years? These require completely different marketing strategies. If he's selling soon and the CMO doesn't know it, they're optimizing for the wrong timeframe.

5. Customer acquisition cost inflation will undermine unit economics

The $3M budget generating $12M revenue implies roughly $250 cost per customer acquisition (assuming 12,000 customers/year at $1,000 average ticket). As Google Ads costs increase and competitors bid up keywords, maintaining this CAC while scaling becomes increasingly challenging.

Industry data indicates home services Google Ads costs increased 35-50% from 2020 to 2024. If this continues, the $250 CAC becomes $337-375 without any change in strategy—just market inflation. At $100M scale, every 10% increase in CAC costs the company an additional $1M+ annually. Without channel diversification and brand building to create organic demand, the company is trapped in an auction it can't win long-term.

✅ subscribe

---

What This CMO Really Needs to Do in Year One

Fix the reputation challenges before scaling (Months 1-4)

The company cannot scale marketing until the product and sales methodology improvements are in place. This means:

• Working with operations to identify why Yelp ratings are low and Google ratings are high (likely different customer segments responding to different marketing)
• Training sales teams on consultative selling vs. high-pressure tactics
• Implementing transparent pricing that reduces "ripoff" perception
• Building systematic review generation for satisfied customers

Success looks like: Yelp rating improving from 2.7 to 3.5+ stars within 6 months, with complaint themes changing from "pricing/pressure" to normal service issues.

Failure looks like: Ignoring this and scaling marketing, which generates more volume but also more angry customers and negative reviews, making the problem exponentially worse.

Build measurement infrastructure that survives scrutiny (Months 1-6)

The "every dollar must be measurable" requirement means the CMO needs attribution systems that actually work:

• Multi-touch attribution connecting TV ads → Google searches → phone calls → completed jobs → revenue
• Call tracking across all channels with unique phone numbers
• CRM integration (ServiceTitan or Jobber) with offline conversion imports to Google Ads
• Marketing mix modeling to identify saturation curves by channel

Success looks like: Executive dashboards showing true incremental ROI by channel, not just platform-reported numbers. Being able to prove Google LSAs have 4.2x incremental ROAS while Meta Ads have 2.1x, justifying budget reallocation.

Failure looks like: Relying on Google Ads dashboard claiming "5.2x ROAS" without incrementality testing, making significantly wrong budget decisions, and having no data to defend decisions when ROI questions arise.

Sequence geographic expansion strategically, not simultaneously (Months 6-12)

Don't try to enter 10 states at once. Pick 2-3 adjacent markets (such as Houston, Austin, San Antonio if starting from Dallas), prove the playbook works, then expand.

Success looks like: Each new market launching with documented process (local SEO, GMB optimization, LSA setup, initial ad spend) and hitting profitability within 12-18 months.

Failure looks like: Spreading $3M across 10 markets, achieving sub-scale presence in all of them, failing to rank in local search anywhere, burning through budget without building sustainable market positions.

🟥 GET UNSTUCK: Book an hour with CMO recruiter, Harry Joiner, who prepared this analysis. Includes a 3-month membership to NEXTgig™

---

Smart Questions to Ask in Interviews

"What's the actual equity component of this offer?"

If they say "we can discuss that later" or "we don't typically offer equity at this level," the candidate should recognize they're being asked to take 40-60% below-market salary with no upside. That's not a negotiation worth having. If they say "yes, we're offering X% with Y vesting schedule," the candidate can evaluate whether the risk/reward makes sense.

"What happened with the previous marketing leader, and why is this role open now?"

The LinkedIn profile shows an Arie Weissman as marketing director. Why isn't he being promoted to CMO? Did he leave? Was he fired? Has the role been open for months because they can't find anyone at this salary? The answer indicates whether this is a growth opportunity or a revolving door.

"How do you expect to fund expansion to $100M—through cash flow, debt, or raising equity?"

If the answer is "cash flow," the 733% growth target is probably unrealistic without massive external capital. If it's "we're raising equity," the marketing budget might disappear when investors dig into unit economics. If it's "we're not sure," proceed with extreme caution.

"What's your timeline for resolving the FLSA lawsuit, and how might that affect marketing budget?"

This question shows the candidate has done their homework and understands that legal settlements can significantly impact marketing budgets. Their reaction is revealing: Do they get defensive? Do they have a plan? Are they transparent about the risk?

"When you say 'every dollar must be measurable,' what's your actual timeframe for ROI—30 days, 90 days, 12 months?"

If they say "we need to see ROI in 30-60 days," they don't understand brand marketing and the CMO will be forced to focus only on bottom-funnel performance channels. If they say "we understand brand building takes 12-24 months but performance channels should show ROI in 60-90 days," they're sophisticated enough to work with.

✅ subscribe

---

How to Position Yourself

Emphasize operational marketing, not strategy consulting

Based on the posting's tone ("results-driven," "measurable," "ROI-focused"), they want someone who executes, not someone who makes PowerPoints about brand positioning. In interviews, emphasize:

• "I personally managed $2M+ Google Ads budgets and reduced CAC by 34%"
• "I built the attribution system that connected offline conversions to digital spend"
• "I trained the sales team on converting marketing leads at 75%+ close rates"

Avoid: "I developed a comprehensive brand strategy framework that aligned stakeholders around our value proposition." That's consultant-speak. They want an operator.

Show incrementality testing and measurement expertise

This company is obsessed with proving ROI. If the candidate can demonstrate they've run holdout tests, built multi-touch attribution models, and used marketing mix modeling to optimize budgets, they'll stand out. Most CMOs just trust platform-reported numbers.

Specifically mention:

• "I discovered Facebook was over-reporting ROAS by 60% through incrementality testing"
• "I used MMM to reallocate $400K from saturated channels to high-lift channels, improving blended ROAS from 4.1x to 6.3x"

Don't oversell the strategic vision elements

This isn't a "we need a visionary CMO to reimagine our brand" role. It's a "we're growing fast and need someone to make our marketing more efficient and scalable" role. If the candidate spends the interview talking about brand purpose and customer journey mapping, they'll sound like they don't understand what the company needs.

They need execution discipline, measurement rigor, and the ability to scale systems. Lead with that.

🟥 GET UNSTUCK: Book an hour with CMO recruiter, Harry Joiner, who prepared this analysis. Includes a 3-month membership to NEXTgig™

---

Salary Negotiation Intel

They have budget flexibility—they're spending $3M on marketing

A company spending 25% of revenue on marketing clearly values growth and is willing to invest. The low salary offer isn't because they're broke—it's because they may not understand market rates or are testing to see if someone will accept it.

Counter with: "The scope you've described—scaling from $12M to $100M—typically requires a CMO at $275K-350K base plus equity. I'm seeing the range at $100K-$200K. Can you help me understand the thinking there?"

Make them defend the number. If they say "we're a small company, that's our budget," respond with: "You're spending $3M on marketing annually. The difference between effective deployment and ineffective deployment of that budget is $1M+ in wasted spend. A $350K CMO who saves you $1M pays for themselves twice over."

If they won't move on salary, equity becomes non-negotiable

If they're firm on $150K salary for a $300K-level role, the candidate needs 3-5% equity with vesting tied to revenue/EBITDA milestones. Otherwise the risk/reward is completely imbalanced.

Say: "I understand you're at $12M revenue now. If I help you reach $100M with 15% EBITDA margins and the company sells at 12x, that's a $180M exit. I'm taking on significant below-market compensation and execution risk. I'd need 3% equity to make this work."

This seems like a "prove yourself first" role

The combination of ambitious goals and conservative compensation suggests they want someone to demonstrate results before fully investing. This isn't necessarily bad, but it means:

• The first 90-180 days are an extended tryout
• Budget might be more constrained than the $3M suggests
• The CMO will need quick wins to build credibility and unlock resources

Negotiate: "I'm comfortable with a prove-it structure, but let's put milestones in writing. If I achieve X revenue growth or Y ROI improvement in 90 days, compensation adjusts to market rate. If I hit the $20M revenue milestone, equity vests early."

✅ subscribe

---

Bottom Line: Should You Take This?

This is a high-risk, high-reward opportunity for the right person

The right person has these characteristics:

• Possesses "walk away from a job" money, so the below-market salary doesn't hurt financially
• Genuinely excited about building something from $12M to $100M and okay with the risk of failure
• Has specific home services experience and isn't learning on the job
• Comfortable with founder-led, centralized decision-making environments
• Can negotiate real equity to justify the salary discount

The wrong person would be someone who:

• Needs market-rate salary to support their lifestyle (the $100K-200K won't suffice)
• Expects big-company resources and processes
• Wants full autonomy without constant founder input
• Thinks marketing alone can fix operations/reputation problems
• Can't build measurement infrastructure from scratch

🟥 GET UNSTUCK: Book an hour with CMO recruiter, Harry Joiner, who prepared this analysis. Includes a 3-month membership to NEXTgig™

---

What I'd Do If This Were My Decision

I'd take the first interview to understand the equity situation. If there's no equity and they won't move on salary, I'd politely decline—the risk/reward doesn't work. If there's 2-3% equity with reasonable vesting, I'd dig deeper into:

1. Founder's actual exit timeline
2. Plans for resolving the lawsuit
3. Why the previous marketing leader left
4. How they currently measure marketing ROI (reveals sophistication level)

If those answers are satisfactory, I'd negotiate hard for:

• $200K base minimum (top of their stated range)
• 3% equity with accelerated vesting at revenue milestones
• Documented authority over marketing budget allocation
• Written agreement that first 90 days focuses on building measurement infrastructure, not just spending more

Final Assessment: The opportunity is real—the market is fragmented, the company has proven growth ability, and the marketing budget is substantial. However, the compensation structure, reputation challenges, and pending lawsuit are significant red flags. A candidate would need exceptional equity and/or unusual personal circumstances to make this worth the risk at the stated salary.

---

1./ DISCLAIMER: This blog is for informational purposes only. ALL APPLICANTS ARE APPLYING DIRECTLY TO THESE COMPANIES. THESE ARE NOT MY SEARCHES. Anyone can send me a VP/CMO job posting for publication and I will consider adding it with research + insights, similar to the other posts on this site. There's NO CHARGE to submit a job, and this is a highly-targeted subscriber list -- plus I have 32K Linkedin followers and moderate TWO of the top five Linkedin groups for ecommerce.

2./ ABOUT: My objective with this blog is to give my readers better insight on publicly posted VP/CMO jobs so they can be more thoughtful about where / how they apply. All information contained herein was available online. If you know someone who has already applied for this job, send them this write up.

3./ EDITS: If you are currently employed by the company in this posting and you’d like me to make an addition or correction to this write up, that’s NO PROBLEM. Simply text your request to (404) 281-2025, and I’ll call you at my soonest convenience. If you'd like to engage me as a recruiter (20% contingency / 90-day replacement), use THIS LINK to schedule a call.

4./ LINKEDIN: If you'd like to hit me up on LinkedIn, CLICK HERE. Since 2005, I've been a very active recruiter for marketing and ecommerce. (Just ask ChatGPT, "Using at least 10 sources from around the web, what can you tell me about ecommerce recruiter, Harry Joiner?")

5./ SUBSCRIBE: To subscribe to the CMO Job of the Day, CLICK HERE. Simply unsubscribe at the end of your job search.

6./ RESUMES: Jobseekers, if you'd like to send me your latest resume, my email address is Harry.Joiner [at] EcommerceRecruiter [dot] com. I'd love to hear from you.